Multi-agent workflow migration assessment

2 min readReferenceUpdated 2026-05-19

What you'll find here

The MultiAgentWorkflowMapping and MultiAgentWorkflowMigrationAssessment contracts that describe how external workflow systems map into Craik before bridges or importers are built.

Assessment, not bridge.

Records migration compatibility and risks so later dry runs, migration maps, and bridge decisions stay reviewable.

Records

Contract

Records

Fields

MultiAgentWorkflowMapping

per concept

Source concept · target workflow concept (agent / role / queue / artifact / memory / approval) · target Craik surface · support level (supported / partial / unsupported) · notes · required controls · unsupported fields.

MultiAgentWorkflowMigrationAssessment

per workflow

Assessment id · workflow name · overall support level · mappings · policy notes · redaction requirement · policy envelope id · evidence ids · receipt ids.

Compatibility

Supported mappings

• Agents & roles → Craik agent roles when authority is explicit
• Queues → delegation queues when dispatch, ownership, receipts, and review are bounded
• Artifacts, memories, approvals → preserve evidence, receipt, policy, redaction semantics

Unsupported

• Unbounded autonomous queues
• Hidden side effects
• Raw private artifacts
• Approval steps without receipts

What's next

ReferenceMulti-agent workflow bridgeThe bridge that follows an assessment.ReferenceImport dry-run reportsHow an assessment becomes a reviewable dry run.ReferenceAgent rolesThe roles external agents map to.